March 16, 2011
The Honorable Peter Denuzze
Town and City Clerk
27 West Main Street
New Britain, CT 06051
Dear Mr. Denuzze:
Two tenets that play a pivotal role in our democratic process are transparency and fairness. Unfortunately, the recent resolution passed by the Common Council that singles out Council members who own businesses is neither fair nor transparent and comes precariously close to being unconstitutional.
This resolution, under the guise of a harmless report, is the latest salvo in a battle of partisan mudslinging. Caught in the crossfire are two community minded businessmen, Alderman Mark Bernacki and Alderman Willy Pabon who are wrongly accused of circumventing City purchasing procedures. Without evidence and despite repeated clarifications from Finance Director Robert Curry and others that all procurement processes and procedures have been followed, this vendetta continues.
If the Council was truly interested in full and fair disclosure of City work or payments that could be a possible conflict for those serving on the Council or as Mayor, this report would include ALL employers of those elected officials whether it be profit, not for profit or government entity. The Democrat Council members certainly gave the message loud and clear that fairness was not their aim when they roundly turned aside suggestions to do just that.
Our justice system and constitution is predicated upon equal treatment and against singling out a person or class of persons for discriminatory treatment. Yet the Democratic Council majority does just that by placing a target on Aldermen Bernacki and Pabon by precisely wording this resolution so that for all practical purposes it applies only to them. City Corporation Counsel previously warned that Council that such uncorroborated allegations could lead to defamation litigation from those so unjustly accused, but the Council majority ignores prudent legal advice and forges ahead with this witch hunt.
The claim that the aim of this resolution is not personal or political from Alderman DeFronzo, the sponsor of this resolution, is disingenuous. During the course of debate on this resolution, Alderman DeFronzo’s own words prove otherwise as he refers to the Republican members of the Council as “the other side” making it clear that this was a political battle, not an attempt at good government. Again, if full and fair disclosure and not political sniping were the goals, the resolution would include all employers or businesses and not just a select few.
Denuzze
Page Two
March 16, 2011
Some may characterize this veto as being political in nature. I will state unequivocally that should a resolution reach my desk that includes payments made by the City to any entity employing or owned by the Mayor or a member of the Council, I would sign and support that. There is no good reason aside from politics to exclude any group. It’s all public information and available for the asking. And if Council members feel the public would benefit from reports, then more information would be of greater benefit to the public.
In fact, if people are genuinely interested in disclosure, all potential conflicts should be disclosed. To that end, I would encourage inclusion of spouses’ employers in order to see all potential sources of conflict as money winds up in the same household. Shouldn’t it be the public who decides the implications of $77 thousand over ten years on small printing jobs to Alderman Bernacki’s business AND $2.2 million over the same time period that went to the Human Resources Agency of New Britain which employs Alderman Trueworthy’s wife? Having the Council interject their political slant and filter is an insult to the intelligence of the voting public.
For the above reasons, and with all due respect to the Council, I hereby veto Resolution #31338 of the March 9, 2011 meeting of the New Britain Common Council. If we take supporters of this resolution at their word that this is not political or personal, they will come back with a fairer, more balanced approach to this reporting of city payments to the Mayor and Council members and spare the City further hypocrisy.
Sincerely,
Timothy T. Stewart
Mayor, City of New Britain
cc: Common Council
Gennaro Bizzarro, Corporation Counsel
Robert Curry, Finance Director
Monday, March 21, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
Way to go Mr. Mayor!
This is one of the most insulting pieces of crap these socialists have ever rammed through--all in the sake of their radical agenda.
If you want real news, maybe it is time to start examining where all 15 Aldermen work, and looking at what funds they are voting for that benefit them and their employers?
We recall the words of a World War II Poster - "A SLIP OF THE LIP CAN SINK A SHIP" and the words of Alderman DeFronzo - "THE OTHER SIDE".
During the course of debate on resolution #31338 by Alderman DeFronzo’s, he refers to the Republican members of the Council as “the other side” making it clear that this was his political battle cry.
I was rolling on the floor laughing when I read that the mayor suggested the Democrats on the council follow the Constitution.
Doesn't that interfere with them simply doing whatever they want to whomsoever they want, regardless of the consequences?
Thank you for stopping the madness. We have appropriate fiscal controls in place. And by the way, where is the alleged investigation of a crime??? Apparently there was no tort.
I was stuck on the suggestion that any of these Democratic mush brains would know how to read.
I guess DeFronzo and the rest of the radicals on the council are in another world--now referred to as "the other side" or could it be "THE DARK SIDE?"
The mayor once again put a stop to radical nonsense that makes our city the laughing stock of this crazy state. You really have to work hard to stand out in this radical socialist state, but somehow thanks to these morons on the council, New Britain always does seem to be the ultimate extreme of lunacy.
this is just another example of the travesty that is being a lib demo
I am proud of our mayor for standing up to these radicals.
4:00 am post. Tim O'Brien. Is that you?
Anonymous said...
4:00 am post. Tim O'Brien. Is that you?
Maybe he was up because he had to change the baby's diaper!
What is O'Brien to do when his son is too old to be carrying him around anymore?
You can't tell looking but the baby is girl.
Post a Comment