When DeFronzo was drafted to the war, he refused to serve because he had a moral opposition to killing when it involved killing America's enemy--the communists, so he became a conscientious objector.
Now he has no moral problem with the state killing, since it doesn't involve the killing of communists, is that what you are trying to tell us?
Capitol punishment hasn't proven to be a deterrent to others committing heinous crimes. Why should a murderer be allowed to live, when the people who are murdered weren't given that option?
Let me see if I understand the story correctly?
ReplyDeleteWhen DeFronzo was drafted to the war, he refused to serve because he had a moral opposition to killing when it involved killing America's enemy--the communists, so he became a conscientious objector.
Now he has no moral problem with the state killing, since it doesn't involve the killing of communists, is that what you are trying to tell us?
Capitol punishment hasn't proven to be a deterrent to others committing heinous crimes. Why should a murderer be allowed to live, when the people who are murdered weren't given that option?
ReplyDeleteCapital punishment may not be a deterrent to murder but it sure makes certain that a proven murderer will not do it again! I'm for that.
ReplyDelete