Anyone who saw the interview on Glenn Beck a few months ago would agree that Blumenthal comes off as a total moron in response to even the most basic questions. Beck made him look like a horses rear end without even trying.
I loved it when they called Blumenthal "Martha Coakley in pants!"
The Democrats are dismissing the suggestions that Blumenthal would lose, once people get to hear his seeming inability to form coherent sentences, simply because of his so-called soaring numbers in the polls. If memory serves me correctly, Martha Coakley was 35 points ahead of Scott Brown in the polls, and some of these same Democrats suggested that Scott Brown was even wasting his time running.
Just maybe we will have Martha Coakley--The Sequel right here in little old Connecticut!
I know most everyone I talk to is becoming more and more anti-Democrat, so only time will tell for sure.
Now you know why I usually refer to him as blumen-idiot!
ReplyDeleteWith what is happening in America, who in their right mind would ever again vote for a Democrat????
Anyone who saw the interview on Glenn Beck a few months ago would agree that Blumenthal comes off as a total moron in response to even the most basic questions. Beck made him look like a horses rear end without even trying.
ReplyDeleteI loved it when they called Blumenthal "Martha Coakley in pants!"
ReplyDeleteThe Democrats are dismissing the suggestions that Blumenthal would lose, once people get to hear his seeming inability to form coherent sentences, simply because of his so-called soaring numbers in the polls. If memory serves me correctly, Martha Coakley was 35 points ahead of Scott Brown in the polls, and some of these same Democrats suggested that Scott Brown was even wasting his time running.
Just maybe we will have Martha Coakley--The Sequel right here in little old Connecticut!
I know most everyone I talk to is becoming more and more anti-Democrat, so only time will tell for sure.
Blumenthal is Coakley in pants and Murphy is Pelosi in a man's suit.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I have seen, a nine year old could out debate Blumy!
ReplyDelete