Speaking of conflicts, Alderman DeFronzo is a BOE employee as a teacher. This means any bonding or budget monies passed from the city to the BOE could benefit him and other Democrat cronies working for the school system!
Alderman DeFronzo is simply someone trying to show how "with it" he is, which, in actuality he is not.
]He has a B.S. Degree from U Conn in Political Science. I suppose he qualified to hoild a teaching certificate by having a minor in Phys. Ed.
He is probably trying to deflect attention from the fact that his father in law is Larry Hermanowski. Probably, Alderman DeFronzo doesn't realize that, including himself, there are eight (8) Democrat Council members (inlcuding Heranowski) that have interest conflicts because of jobs they hold with the city or related NP agencies.
Anyone familiar with Council procedures knows full well why this Resolution has been placed on the Council Meeting agenda for 3/9/11. While the resolution is sufficiently different from a similar one advanced by Trueworthy at the Council's most recent meeting, the intent is the same, to wit, to demonize the Mayor and two Republican Aldermen.
I don't believe that Alderman DeFronzo is/was familiar enough with Council procedures to know that since Alderman Trueworthy"s similar resolution (same intent) was defeated, it could not be submitted again during this Council's tenure. DeFronzo had to be told that. Ergo, submit a "new" one with different wording but, one that has the same intent.
So, the Council will go through this same charade again at it's 3/9 meeting. Why? Because some Democrats haven't looked at what this resolution could mean now, not just what it may mean in November. So, play your silly games but, be careful, then again, DON"T.
DeFronzo is just an Obamabot like his conscientious objector father.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of conflicts, Alderman DeFronzo is a BOE employee as a teacher. This means any bonding or budget monies passed from the city to the BOE could benefit him and other Democrat cronies working for the school system!
ReplyDeleteI guess the ACORN doesn't fall from from the radical tree, does it?
ReplyDeleteAlderman DeFronzo is simply someone trying to show how "with it" he is, which, in actuality he is not.
ReplyDelete]He has a B.S. Degree from U Conn in Political Science. I suppose he qualified to hoild a teaching certificate by having a minor in Phys. Ed.
He is probably trying to deflect attention from the fact that his father in law is Larry Hermanowski. Probably, Alderman DeFronzo doesn't realize that, including himself, there are eight (8) Democrat Council members (inlcuding Heranowski) that have interest conflicts because of jobs they hold with the city or related NP agencies.
But of course, that is SOP with Democrats.
So he is one of those inferior overpaid, under worked union public school teachers?
ReplyDeletedoes that mean that DeFronzo will get 2 pensions from the city?
ReplyDeleteHe's trying to assume the duties of former Alderman Sherwood, one of which was to do the thinking for Alderman Trueworthy.
ReplyDeleteAnyone familiar with Council procedures knows full well why this Resolution has been placed on the Council Meeting agenda for 3/9/11. While the resolution is sufficiently different from a similar one advanced by Trueworthy at the Council's most recent meeting, the intent is the same, to wit, to demonize the Mayor and two Republican Aldermen.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe that Alderman DeFronzo is/was familiar enough with Council procedures to know that since Alderman Trueworthy"s similar resolution (same intent) was defeated, it could not be submitted again during this Council's tenure. DeFronzo had to be told that. Ergo, submit a "new" one with different wording but, one that has the same intent.
So, the Council will go through this same charade again at it's 3/9 meeting. Why? Because some Democrats haven't looked at what this resolution could mean now, not just what it may mean in November. So, play your silly games but, be careful, then again, DON"T.
Lou Salvio