Here is one recent example of Marxism in action: After its deafening silence on the rapes, drug sales and overdoses and even deaths on OWS, the Obama regime is now trying to distance itself from the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement, ostensibly well ahead of the Democratic National Convention (DNC).
The Dems want you to believe that they worry that OWS will crash this summer’s DNC when in fact they know every OWS move before it is made. So Media reports raising the question whether or not OWS protesters “will do to Charlotte’s Democratic National Convention in the summer of 2012 what demonstrators did to the Chicago DNC in 1968”..
If President Obama were really another Teddy Roosevelt, he'd take his chances and say what he means. If he wants to redistribute wealth and tell corporations how much profit they can earn and how many workers they must hire, let him make his case and his facts and his policy to the American people.
Since Occupy Wall Street protesters first set up camp in Manhattan's Zuccotti Park, no one in the movement they started has managed to articulate exactly what they want. But what the Occupy movement lacks in terms of a coherent message, they more than make up for in there direct action against West Coast Shipping Ports.
On 12//12/11 Occupy protesters tried to shut down 11 West Coast shipping ports from San Diego to Anchorage in an attempt to "disrupt the profits of the one percent." According to the Occupiers, our nation's ports have "become economic engines for the elite that allow the 1 % to rip the shirts off the backs of the 99 % who turn their profits.
But the people who run the Port of Oakland. Calif, see it differently. They purchased ads in local newspapers explaining, that shutting down the Port of Oakland is a bad idea. The working people who depend on the Port of Oakland for their livelihoods didn't want to see the ports shut down either. "I will lose about $350, and at holiday time that hurts," truck driver Hai Ngo told The San Francisco Chronicle Newspaper. "It's just a waste of our time, and money, this Occupy Ports won't accomplish anything."
And in cities without ports, like Denver, local Occupy cells tried to show solidarity by shutting down a Walmart distribution center. Again, protesters gave no thought to those who need Walmart's products or those who depend on Walmart paychecks.
And in cities without ports, like Denver, local Occupy cells tried to show solidarity by shutting down a Walmart distribution center. Again, protesters gave no thought to those who need Walmart's products or those who depend on Walmart paychecks.
THEY SHOULD SHOW SOLIDARITY WITH THE C0UNCIL DEMS FOR SUCCESSFULLY DRIVING WALMART OUT OF NEW BRITAIN AND TAKING THEIR 170 JOBS WITH THEM!
We think four years of Gingrich or Romney or Perry will be better for the country than another four years of Obama....
....We think four years of Gingrich or Romney or Perry will be better for the country than another four years of current Obama residing 4 more years in the "White House". Anyone who wants to test this thesis can look back at the last four years and then imagine what they would have been like if Obama turn out to be a lame duck candidate for a second term at "White House".
Here is one recent example of Marxism in action: After its deafening silence on the rapes, drug sales and overdoses and even deaths on OWS, the Obama regime is now trying to distance itself from the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement, ostensibly well ahead of the Democratic National Convention (DNC).
ReplyDeleteThe Dems want you to believe that they worry that OWS will crash this summer’s DNC when in fact they know every OWS move before it is made. So Media reports raising the question whether or not OWS protesters “will do to Charlotte’s Democratic National Convention in the summer of 2012 what demonstrators did to the Chicago DNC in 1968”..
If President Obama were really another Teddy Roosevelt, he'd take his chances and say what he means. If he wants to redistribute wealth and tell corporations how much profit they can earn and how many workers they must hire, let him make his case and his facts and his policy to the American people.
ReplyDeleteWhy the real 99 % can't afford the 1 % Occupiers?
ReplyDeleteSince Occupy Wall Street protesters first set up camp in Manhattan's Zuccotti Park, no one in the movement they started has managed to articulate exactly what they want. But what the Occupy movement lacks in terms of a coherent message, they more than make up for in there direct action against West Coast Shipping Ports.
On 12//12/11 Occupy protesters tried to shut down 11 West Coast shipping ports from San Diego to Anchorage in an attempt to "disrupt the profits of the one percent." According to the Occupiers, our nation's ports have "become economic engines for the elite that allow the 1 % to rip the shirts off the backs of the 99 % who turn their profits.
But the people who run the Port of Oakland. Calif, see it differently. They purchased ads in local newspapers explaining, that shutting down the Port of Oakland is a bad idea. The working people who depend on the Port of Oakland for their livelihoods didn't want to see the ports shut down either. "I will lose about $350, and at holiday time that hurts," truck driver Hai Ngo told The San Francisco Chronicle Newspaper. "It's just a waste of our time, and money, this Occupy Ports won't accomplish anything."
And in cities without ports, like Denver, local Occupy cells tried to show solidarity by shutting down a Walmart distribution center. Again, protesters gave no thought to those who need Walmart's products or those who depend on Walmart paychecks.
And in cities without ports, like Denver, local Occupy cells tried to show solidarity by shutting down a Walmart distribution center. Again, protesters gave no thought to those who need Walmart's products or those who depend on Walmart paychecks.
ReplyDeleteTHEY SHOULD SHOW SOLIDARITY WITH THE C0UNCIL DEMS FOR SUCCESSFULLY DRIVING WALMART OUT OF NEW BRITAIN AND TAKING THEIR 170 JOBS WITH THEM!
We think four years of Gingrich or Romney or Perry will be better for the country than another four years of Obama....
ReplyDelete....We think four years of Gingrich or Romney or Perry will be better for the country than another four years of current Obama residing 4 more years in the "White House". Anyone who wants to test this thesis can look back at the last four years and then imagine what they would have been like if Obama turn out to be a lame duck candidate for a second term at "White House".