Sherwood's statement in the paper makes this case even more bazaar!
He basically says that performing CPR is absolutely part of a police officers job, but the city stands by their original statement that if that officer is injured or becomes ill from a contagious disease, the city is simply going to turn its back on the officer by vehemently opposing the worker's comp case. Basically he apparently is saying that these officers are absolutely expected to do this, but they are completely on their own should something happen.
I guess the message emanating from the mayor's office is that these police officers should simply let these people die in the future?
Sherwood's statement in the paper makes this case even more bazaar!
ReplyDeleteHe basically says that performing CPR is absolutely part of a police officers job, but the city stands by their original statement that if that officer is injured or becomes ill from a contagious disease, the city is simply going to turn its back on the officer by vehemently opposing the worker's comp case. Basically he apparently is saying that these officers are absolutely expected to do this, but they are completely on their own should something happen.
I guess the message emanating from the mayor's office is that these police officers should simply let these people die in the future?
Where's the chief? Anybody seen him around lately? Back in England perhaps gents?
ReplyDeleteI wonder if fire fighters will be allowed by this radical extremist regime to perform CPR, or is that not job related for them too?
ReplyDelete