In this article what the Herald fails to do is to ask for information from anyone else that was in office on the Council when the previous "independent auditor" was hired and then resigned. All comments came from Dems.
In her farewell "rant" at a Council meeting the "Auditor" blamed me for her having to leave. Yes, I exposed the fact that she submitted incorrect time worked reports that resulted in her being overpaid by the city to the tune of over $4000. She resigned probably because she might have been made to pay back the money.
She was hired by Trueworthy and Bielinski who wrote her contract - City Officials wanted nothing to do with it. She answered to nobody and chose her own work hours.
As for Trueworthy's claim that she saved the city $375 K, that is pure hogwash!
And what about O'Brien's hiring freeze? That's hogwash too; look at page 2 of O'Brien's Budget document; Items 2,3 and 4 show increases of $60K each.
I saved all the documentation that I had re this "auditor" and I won't be muzzled by Sherwod.
I won't even attempt to tell O'Brien where to find the information because he might have the city hall computers locked up. The Herald must have had to ask permission for this article to be written.
Can't wait to see my tax bill in July! "
Lou, it won't be in your taxes this year but it will show in an increase in your water bill and any thing else they want to bill. Landlords will increase rent to cover the cost of all the increases. Tenants will have to pay more rent and with an unemployement of 18% guess who will picking up the tab. Property will become blight and the city will own unsaleabe land.The cost of living off the goverment in New Britain is greater then the state of CT.. Time to move out of New Britain and the state.
ReplyDeleteThe reality that liberals don't seem to grasp: somebody has to pay for all their nonsense.
ReplyDeleteJust for the record, you cannot always pass the cost of taxes or any increase anywhere onto your tenants---not if you want good tenants who stay---and that is if you are an owner occupied multi-family. If you own a property that you do not live in, you can try passing the costs on but I agree with comment number one. The result, in today's society, will be blight. Anyone read Chris Powell's editorial in Friday's Herald? Read the last two paragraphs and how it appropriately applies to our City's plight as well as our State and country.
ReplyDelete