Thursday, May 2, 2013

CPOA Is going take lagal action Against the Mayor and the Common Council on the HRA Tax Deal

CPOA Headlines

Contents:

If you like our emails please consider forwarding it to your friends or sharing us on FaceBook. Help us grow our audience!


Taking Action on HRA Deal

May 01, 2013 10:02 pm | Nicholas Mercier

As you may read in the paper today or tomorrow, the CPOA is currently looking into our legal options for opposing the proposed deal the mayor is brokering with the HRA. It is our opinion that this deal, which we feel is of questionable legality, is bad for the taxpayers and sends the wrong message to both the taxpayers and to other charitable organizations. (more…)

Read More
share on Twitter Like Taking Action on HRA Deal on Facebook


Budget Hearing Coming!

May 01, 2013 04:31 pm | Nicholas Mercier

According to various sources the Public Hearing on the Mayor’s budget will take place next week on Thursday, May 9, 2013. The location will likely be the New Britain High School but the time is still unknown (though it has typically been between 6:00 and 7:00 to start in the past.) The CPOA hopes to have a fact sheet and various talking points available by the start of next week, but you can also look through our various past articles on the budget for some details.
UPDATE: The start of the meeting will be 7:00pm. The CPOA may be planning a rally to take place before the meeting. We will provide more information  as it becomes available.

Read More
share on Twitter Like Budget Hearing Coming! on Facebook

Recent Posts

HRA Taxes Forgiven
Surplus Masks Failed Revenues
O’Brien’s Budget Ignores Malloy’s Proposal
Fictional Revenues
Agenda for the Annual Meeting

Find us on Facebook for requent updates

Join in the discussion and get the latest updates as well as share our articles and updates with your friends.


Join us on Twitter

Help us spread the word, ask us questions, share your thoughts.


Not a member?

Download and fill out our application today. Membership is only $10 per year. Already a member? Forward this to a friend and help our organization grow.



Copyright © 2013 Citizens' Property Owners Association of New Britain, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up to receive updates at our website, www.cpoanb.org.

Our mailing address is:
Citizens' Property Owners Association of New Britain
PO Box 2312
New Britain, CT 06050

Add us to your address book
Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp
unsubscribe from this list | update subsc

2 comments:

  1. HRA Comments by NB Alderman Jamie Giantonio...

    I have the utmost respect for HRA and the services they provide. Sitting through the CDBG grant process you see all the lives this agency touches and the great services they offer to our residents. However- a deal was negotiated for HRA to pay a below market price for a property, in exchange for 25 years of taxes and 25 years of not asking for exceptions. Taking that into account I felt at least the spirit of the deal should be honored- I was open to discussing a reduced tax rate but the rest of the common council did not feel the same.

    I voted on the issue what I felt was best for the citizens of New Britain as a whole and was the sole no vote in a 10-1 approval. As far as I was concerned this issue was a done deal. The first I heard of this possible CPOA lawsuit was when the NB Herald Reporter Mr. Robert Storace called me and asked me for a quote. My comments about a "long legal process" came from discussion I had with attorneys PRIOR to me voting on this HRA item.

    When I am actually given advanced notice about an item that will be on our agenda (in the case of this HRA vote I had a whole 5-6 hours) - I take the time to fully understand the item before voting on it. In this case I sought the opinion of several attorneys (Including getting the thoughts of an attorney that works in the NB Corp Counsels office) who all expressed concerns to me about the legality of this and that proceeding with this plan may open the city to a lawsuit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. " This is the most flagrant abuse of City taxpayers that O'Brien has perpetrated thus far. As I have said before, check O'Brien's latest reelection campaign contribution list and you will see who benefits. Which attorney is negotiating for HRA? Attorney Michael Carrier. Who - which attorney - is representing the City? I don't know except that Corporation Counsel, John King said, “The city is reasonably confident that it has the authority to renegotiate the terms of the original agreement with HRA and release the deed restriction as part of any new understanding entered into with HRA." REASONABLY CONFIDENT?" Give me a break, the taxpayers pay this guy? Again, which CITY ATTORNEY will represent the taxpayers? Not one has been mentioned, WHY?
    And then, this from Phil Sherwood, "Regarding Mercier’s possible lawsuit, Sherwood said, “If Nick wants to make a political argument as to why it is policy he does not support, that’s fine. However, if he is attempting to make a legal argument, he appears to be a little bit over his head.” When and from where did Sherwood get his law experience?, campaigning for George Jepsen? And, check and see who on the Council voted for this; SURPRISED?
    And the public has been effectively eliminated from comment on this issue. Taxpayers, have you had enough yet? "
    Just found out from a NB Daily paper that Corporation Counsel, John King will represent the City. King's position is an appointed one - by Mayor O'Brien. Doesn't this represent a conflict of interest? King serves at the "pleasure" of O'Brien. Mr. Sherwood, I am not a lawyer, only a citizen taxpayers asking questions; am I too, in over my head?

    ReplyDelete