Friday, January 9, 2015

The Common Council Leaders Must Decide.


FRANKSMITHSAYSNB EDITORIAL:


In the event the New Britain Democrats repeat The Trueworthy fiasco, with the majority of the common council refusing to remove him from his council seat. And possibly the same procedure that will apparently follow regarding the Susan Bielinski removal; it will then assure the start of third party in the city to selecting elected officials.
 That will adhere to common sense and legal responses protecting the city’s standing within the Connecticut communities stopping the city from being laughed at as being idiotic.

 

9 comments:

  1. The New Britain Independent Party was established in 1989. It may still be in effect.
    Independent is the way to get us on the right tract and of course the right leader.

    ReplyDelete
  2. both parties are disappointments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What a freakin" waste of tax payers time and money and energy, what a bunch of no good losers!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Its only a waste because the there will be no justice, and the Dem's lawlessness will continue on the taxpayers backs. Mike and Sue should be arrested !!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. since when is there ever justice when it involves a Democrat?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just imagine if a Republican were caught rifling through someone else's desk at the state capitol?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was the one who was the "mother" of the New Britain Independent Party in 1989 when confronted with a very nice candidate on the R side who was a retired music teacher and never held office and Don DeFronzo who held views far different than most of us. I tried. It did not work for me in '89. Maybe now. We can not allow the DTC to nominate anymore O'Brien types without a fight! I am not letting the RTC off the hook either. We need quality candidates.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We definitely need to get the Independent Party organized here in New Britain. There doesn't seem to be much difference between the 2 major parties anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I was surprised to read that this position is actually a union position. This is the type of position that should have been made exempt from union membership, but of course, these Democrats want to reward unions wherever possible, especially when they are using our money to do it.

    ReplyDelete