Saturday, March 28, 2009

YouTube - Gingrich warns Obama moving towards 'political dictatorship'


YouTube - Gingrich warns Obama moving towards 'political dictatorship'
Posted by Frank Smith at 28.3.09

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Frank,
If the mush brains won't listen to the former Speaker of the House, then you might as well give up, they are simply brain dead.

March 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Anonymous said...

Many say ACORN stole votes in 2008.

Now it appears that they'll have the opportunity to steal congressional seats in 2010?

You remember ACORN - the gang of wild-eyed leftists who registered legions of fictitious voters for Barack Obama just last year?

Investor's Business Daily wrote:

"[ACORN's] voter-registration fraud is rampant. In Nevada, state officials say the fraudulent registrations included forms for the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys football team, including quarterback Tony Romo... Nevada, along with several other key battleground states, requires no ID to vote."

Do you want this shameless swarm of ideologues helping Barack Hussein Obama run your government?

It seems that Obama does... in December he told a cheering mob of extremist groups, including ACORN:

"We're going to be calling all of you in to help us run the agenda. We're going to be having meetings all over the country."

And he's been as good as his word! Guess what ACORN will doing next year!

Fox News reported that ACORN "signed on as a national partner with the U.S. Census Bureau in February 2009 to assist with the recruitment of the 1.4 million temporary workers needed to go door-to-door to count every person in the United States."

That's right, the storm troopers of ACORN will be knocking on doors all over the country, pretending to count Americans the way they pretended to register voters.

March 28, 2009 at 9:01 PM
Anonymous said...

Canada Free Press - Printer Friendly Page
© V2.0 - CJ Website Design
www.cj-design.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barack Obama
Playing President
Henry Lamb Bio
Email Article



By Henry Lamb Sunday, March 29, 2009
Obama’s performance as POTUS is pretty convincing, if not Oscar-worthy. From the moment CNN called the election, Obama’s rehearsed swagger emerged. He won; he is entitled to gloat. What’s pitiful is that he really thinks he is in charge.

Well before Obama seriously considered a run for President, others evaluated his potential. Khalid Al-Mansour, associate of Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal, one of the world’s richest men, helped get Obama into and through Harvard.

After Harvard, Chicago’s notorious political machine saw Obama’s potential to become the nation’s first black president. This view was shared by rich liberal power brokers, black liberation preachers, and the un-scrubbed street gangs in desperate need of a new hero. This unlikely collection of political forces delivered a well-scrubbed performer to the national stage.

The Obama campaign promised “Hope” and “Change,” but delivered neither. Instead, the same, old socialist-democrat agenda put on a new costume and a face. Eleven of the 12 members of Obama’s advisory board came from the Clinton administration, as did 31 of the 47 members of his transition team. Obama’s administration is almost a repeat of the Clinton team. And there’s a good reason.

A thorough analysis of Obama’s administration reveals that those recalled from the Clinton years have much in common: they share membership in the same organizations that have guided public policy since Roosevelt. The Council on Foreign Relations and, since 1973, the Trilateral Commission, have produced the people who have shaped public policy. These are the people who tell Obama’s teleprompter what to say.

Members of these organizations assemble at least annually with members of England’s Royal Institute of Foreign Affairs, and affiliated organizations from around the world. It is not accurate to say that these organizations “run” the world’s governments. It is absolutely accurate to say that the people who do run the world’s governments are members of these organizations.

Attention is too often diverted from this reality by members of the media, who incidentally, are also members of these same organizations. They quickly open the “conspiracy theory” bucket and paint with lavish strokes all who dare to focus the spotlight of truth on the real source of public policy initiatives.

There is nothing conspiratorial about it. These organizations have a common agenda – global governance. A solid history of the development of this agenda is available here. What is important now is the next step toward realization of this goal.

The next step is the April 2 meeting of the G20 in London. No one will be allowed to ask, but were it possible to identify the people in this meeting who are members of the Council on foreign Relations; the Royal Institute of International Affairs; the Trilateral Commission, or one of their international affiliated organizations, we’d find that the meeting is dominated by members of these groups. Perhaps after the meeting, a participants list can be secured to see exactly to what extent they dominated the meetings.

Another way to test this allegation is to compare the recommendations that come out of the meetings to the proposals that have been advanced by the various organizations whose members participate in the meetings.

The most important goal of the global governance advocates is an independent income stream for the United Nations. Another very important goal is to gain international control of the global economy through the regulation of capital flows, currency, and trade. If the recommendations that come out of the G20 meetings move toward these goals, it will be a pretty good indication of who dominated the meetings.
By surrounding himself with advocates of global governance, his campaign speech in Berlin, and with his public pronouncements, Obama has sent a strong signal to the world that he is ready to lead the United States into the United Nations’ slaughter house. The gateway will be the mechanism to control the global economy produced by the G20 meeting.

The recommendation to come out of this meeting will most likely call for a new mechanism to control the global economy, and a mechanism for collecting taxes on fossil fuel energy. It will not be a full-blown proposal. That’s not how the United Nations works. There will be a policy document agreed by all that sets forth the goals to be achieved over a period of time. The document will also define the working group(s) that will be charged with producing the proposal for the final structure.

The people who populate the working groups will be work-horses of the organizations which designed the agenda in the first place. The news media will report a successful meeting. All parties will go home encouraged, and the members of the behind-the-scenes policy-making groups will continue to shape public policy, now with the approval of the G20.

And Obama will think he did something, while all along he is simply playing the role of President while others use him to advance their own agenda.


(0) Reader Feedback | Subscribe


Henry Lamb Most recent columns
Henry is the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization (ECO), and chairman of Sovereignty International.

Henry Lamb can be reached at: henry@freedom.org

Older articles by Henry Lamb


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Printed from: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9717

March 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Anonymous said...

Canada Free Press - Printer Friendly Page
© V2.0 - CJ Website Design
www.cj-design.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

World’s most successful republic and is in the process of morphing it into an already proven failed system of socialism
Why Should ANY School Be Named After Obama?
Jerry McConnell Bio
Email Article



By Jerry McConnell Sunday, March 29, 2009
Are these signs of the times or advance notices of adulation gone amok? At least two schools in these United States have, or are seriously considering, changing their names from the already established to one consisting of the name of Barack Obama. There are other schools around the country where the proposition have broached without any action to date, but two schools, one located in Portland, Oregon as reported online by KGW.com and one in Hempstead, NY reported by education-world.com are a reality.

Short of catastrophically destroying the economy of this country and all its infrastructural landmarks, what has Barack Obama done to deserve to have schools named after him? He has taken the world’s most successful republic and is in the process of morphing it into an already proven failed system of socialism.

To say that he deserves recognition because he is the first “black” president is a spurious. He is not a black man, or as codified “negroid” due to the fact that that blood line is less than 50 percent of his makeup. He is positively a minimum of 50 percent Caucasian, or white blood due to his mother’s genes of 100 percent Caucasian blood. Obama’s remaining blood is divided into unknown to me, quantities of Arabian and African black blood from his father’s side.

So what qualifies him to have his name placed on several different schools around our country? Was it due to his early life spent in Muslim controlled countries? Was it his later life spent in three different colleges which will not make public his collegiate or personal records? Was it his hustling for dollars as a “Community Activist” living in corrupt and shady dealing Chicago and the state of questionable politics, Illinois? Was it his often shady and very often questionable time spent gaining political office again in the state of Illinois? Was it his sudden status of being enormously wealthy without benefit of having performed any great service or administrative accomplishments in the industrial or business world? Or was it his promises of fairy-land benefits and riches and overly abundant promises of wondrous things if the people of America voted for him as their next president? Or was it his failure to make good on all those promises of fairy-land things that is occurring now as I write this?

Can someone give me ONE good reason why ANYTHING should be named after him unless it’s a place of confinement for liars, cheats and those of duplicitous nature? He was elected under fraudulent circumstances by withholding from scrutiny any evidence that he is a legitimate, constitutionally-mandated, natural born citizen of the United States?

To this day, he has spent untold sums of money, potentially in the millions of dollars to keep this information secret from the public. He puts up with, by more or less totally ignoring requests for such information, great inconvenience when with just the simple act of producing a legitimate birth certificate proving he IS a natural born citizen he could end the entire trauma that has been forced on our judicial system by people seeking the truth in the matter and insure the preservation of our document of all law in this country, the United States Constitution. Without such verification of compliance, each day the validity of legalization of this hallowed document is diminished until it will no longer be a basis for every one of the laws written in this land, or the basis for service to any role of governance or service to our country..

Why does he go to all this inconvenience and deceit if he is as he claims to be, a natural born citizen of the United States? Why is he avoiding the simple act of producing factual documentation of such proof if he is as he claims to be, a natural born citizen of the United States? What is the mystery and what is he hiding? It can only be the factual proof that he is NOT a natural born citizen of the United States, and as such, is disqualified to serve as the President of the United States.

But even more mysteriously, why are so many judges and courts, PARTICULALRY the United States Supreme Court, our highest level of judicial protocol, failing to demand to uphold the requirements of our highest level of judicial documentation, the Constitution? Where do their loyalties lie, with a usurper or with the American people?

Could we be in the process of seeing our beloved country being taken over by other than honest-to-God-American-naturally-bred citizens and offered up for the price of the daily special from foreign despots or anti-American people or groups already in strategic places within our country’s bounds such as CAIR, George Soros, MoveOn.org, or the socio/communist themed ACLU?

The cloaks of secrecy can not remain intact forever; someone will get the truth out soon. Just pray it is before the ongoing damage reaches a no-turning back point.



(0) Reader Feedback | Subscribe


Jerry McConnell Most recent columns
Jerry McConnell is a longtime resident of planet earth with one half century on the seacoast of NH. He is a community activist but promises not to run for President and he feeds ACORN’s to the squirrels. He can be emailed at lethrneck@comcast.net with complaints or the editor at letters@canadafreepress.com with favorables.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Printed from: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9714

March 29, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Anonymous said...

Why does he go to all this inconvenience and deceit if he is as he claims to be, a natural born citizen of the United States? Why is he avoiding the simple act of producing factual documentation of such proof if he is as he claims to be, a natural born citizen of the United States? What is the mystery and what is he hiding?

Because like with everything else, he lies!

March 29, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Anonymous said...

It is even scarier that representatives of the socialist countries he is mimicking are warning: "don't make the same mistakes we did!"

March 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Web Tracking
Online Florist