The man who launched his political career in the home of a man who admittedly blew up government buildings is criticizing regular Americans for raising their voices because what their Congressman is trying to ram down their throats is so repulsive to American values?
According to the Washington Times, if the bill were passed today, 10 years into the plan still 36 million Americans would be totally uninsured after spending trillions of dollars.
This is the absolute proof that this has nothing to do with health care and is nothing more than a bunch of radicals out to take power over your life and whether or not you are allowed to live.
What other reason could you have for spending trillions of dollars and still ending up with the same amount of uninsured Americans???
President Obama ran a winning campaign in part based on providing every American health insurance. Now there is deep divide on the issue and a powerful growing opposition. If you voted for this, you are going to get it, like it or not. Nationalized health insurance not health care is being decided for us. It has little to do with providing health care. We already have the best health care in this country. No American citizen wishes another to be denied treatment for lack of insurance. Our system does have flaws. Having superior health insurance is tied directly to being employed or purchasing it at a high cost. For the unemployed, needy, the disabled, the elderly it is a constant worry and burden. So the decision is being made that those of us with excellent insurance will need to mix in with those who are not so fortunate to provide an even medical playing field. We are being told we can keep our private insurance if we would like...or join the national program. How many will, willingly give up their private health insurance? If your company can save money and eliminate jobs by cancelling participation with private health insurers, what options will that leave. Does England and Canada have a better system? Do their patients have high survival rates? Do Americans travel to those countries to receive better care than at home? NO.
This administration is rushing into this national health insurance program to prove that they can change something. Be careful what you wished for.
6 comments:
You won't need the senior centers in this country once Obama gets his way.
Maybe that is how he plans to pay for the socialized medicine.
By killing off elderly, aren't they basically killing members of their own party? What a bunch of dopes.
The man who launched his political career in the home of a man who admittedly blew up government buildings is criticizing regular Americans for raising their voices because what their Congressman is trying to ram down their throats is so repulsive to American values?
What is wrong with this picture?
According to the Washington Times, if the bill were passed today, 10 years into the plan still 36 million Americans would be totally uninsured after spending trillions of dollars.
This is the absolute proof that this has nothing to do with health care and is nothing more than a bunch of radicals out to take power over your life and whether or not you are allowed to live.
What other reason could you have for spending trillions of dollars and still ending up with the same amount of uninsured Americans???
Even the New York Times calls the claim that if you are happy with your doctor, you can keep him as a false claim!!!!
Sounds like the most liberal paper in the country is calling Obama a LIAR!
President Obama ran a winning campaign in part based on providing
every American health insurance. Now there is deep divide on the issue and a powerful growing opposition. If you voted for this,
you are going to get it, like it or not. Nationalized health insurance not health care is being decided for us. It has little to do with providing health care. We already have the best health care
in this country. No American citizen wishes another to be denied treatment for lack of insurance. Our system does have flaws. Having superior health insurance is tied directly to being
employed or purchasing it at a high cost. For the unemployed, needy, the disabled, the elderly it is a constant worry and burden.
So the decision is being made that those of us with excellent insurance will need to mix in with those who are not so fortunate to provide an even medical playing field. We are being told we can keep our private insurance if we would like...or join the national
program. How many will, willingly
give up their private health insurance? If your company can save money and eliminate jobs by cancelling participation with private health insurers, what options will that leave. Does England and Canada have a better system? Do their patients have high survival rates? Do Americans
travel to those countries to receive better care than at home?
NO.
This administration is rushing into this national health insurance program to prove that they can change something. Be careful what you wished for.
Post a Comment