By Kathleen Parker
Sunday, May 23, 2010; A13
I have a thing for Marines, always have. It began a long time ago when I watched my older brother amble away in the night toward his barracks at Camp Pendleton near San Diego.
I cried myself dry that evening, thinking that I might not see him again, knowing that the next morning he was off to Vietnam. Khe Sanh, his ultimate destination, might as well have been another planet. As it turns out, it was Hell.
Jack came home eventually, a different boy than the one who left. Still just a teenager, he was leaner and meaner. His eyes gave nothing away. When our father and I visited Jack at the Naval Hospital in Philadelphia, where he was being treated for "battle fatigue" and other afflictions, we stuck to safe subjects: college, cars and girls, his primary interests at that point.
To this day, I've yet to hear any stories of war from him, or, for that matter, from any of the men in my family, all of them veterans of various conflicts. A few scattered pictures of tough boys sporting knives and guns occasionally find their way to the top of a shoe box, but there are no videos or journals, no displays of Purple Hearts.
Like most veterans, with a few notable exceptions, my brother has expressed no desire to revisit that time and place, nor any need to boast of his exploits. When you've witnessed the horrors of war, you apparently don't need to tell anyone.
All of these thoughts surfaced as I pondered Richard Blumenthal, the Connecticut attorney general recently infamous for exaggerating his role as a Marine reservist during the Vietnam era. At various times, he has accurately said that he wore the uniform during that period; other times, he has said that he wore the uniform in Vietnam. In fact, he received several draft deferments while a student at Harvard and Cambridge and enlisted in the Marines only when those deferments were running out.
And, he did falsely and knowingly imply that he was a combat veteran. The question is: Why? And what should voters make of it when they go to the polls?
Blumenthal, a Democrat, is running to fill the seat of retiring Sen. Chris Dodd. His fiercest opponent has been Republican Linda McMahon, who says her campaign assisted with a New York Times investigation into Blumenthal's false claims. As an unintended consequence, McMahon's involvement may have provided momentum to her principal Republican rival, former representative Rob Simmons, who did serve in Vietnam and received two Bronze Stars.
On a certain level, it is gratifying that those who served in America's most unpopular war -- and who were vilified back home -- now can enjoy some measure of pride in their service. But the humility common among heroes is in scant evidence these days, and selective memory has rarely been so repugnant.
Blumenthal isn't the first to exaggerate his service, of course. "Stolen Valor" is the title of a book that chronicles phony heroes falsely claiming to have served in Vietnam.
There is, indeed, something unique about the Vietnam era that haunts a generation. All are familiar with the deep divisions that brought students to riot, leaving four dead at Kent State and others to trek to Canada. The draft was the Maginot Line of America's heart, and too many of the unlucky never came home.
Who knows what motivated Blumenthal to stretch his truth? Perhaps it was survivor's guilt.
"There is nothing that binds Marines together like combat and, if you missed it, I can understand that he [Blumenthal] may have actually convinced himself he was there," my brother wrote in an e-mail. "But those who served in combat consider Marines who did not the same brothers, regardless. We are a team and those in the rear are just as important as those on the line."
The deception, as always, is something else. Blumenthal had every right under the law to seek deferments. He had every right to be proud of his service during the Vietnam era. But he did not have the right to build personal equity on the borrowed suffering of others.
Had he gone to Vietnam, as he apparently thinks he should have, he would have learned that, and this: Real heroes never brag, and real Marines don't lie.
kathleenparker@washpost.com
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
The State Democrats must be as ethically lacking as our local Democrats to be endorsing someone like Blumenthal.
With his love of cameras, Blumenthal might think of it as free advertising for his campaign that virtually every newspaper and news network in the country is continuing to call him a liar, day after day.
Even Jay Leno has told jokes about Blumenthal being a lying piece of crap for 2 nights running.
Any decent person would be hiding in shame, but not our Dick Blumenthal--A man our Democratic Party can be proud to be endorsing as a replacement for a sleazeball like Chris Dodd!
I guess we should be happy that the Democrats are so morally bankrupt, which should make Linda McMahon a virtual shoe-in. Those who fail to learn from history are destined to repeat it.
Can anyone say Martha Coakley?
Blumenthal wins nomination at
the democratic convention.
Remember when character
and honesty were valued???
Only a sick and disturbed individual would lie about serving in Vietnam and on many occasions, even in front of veterans groups which I'm sure had more than one or two disabled vets in attendance.
I wish the rest of the main stream media would call this guy what he really is...A LIAR. We all know that if this guy had an (R) next to his name left wing media would have one editorial after another saying how he should resign from AG and pull out of the senate race.
If you think about it… Jane Fonda was in Vietnam longer than Blumenthal.
I look forward to voting for McMahon against Blumenthal. After so many years of that other windbag, Dodd, I've had enough of Democrats representing this state.
Post a Comment