FRANKSMITHSAYSNB EDITORIAL:
With the aid of his comrade, Alderman Trueworthy, they threatened the mayor with their plan to ram through their education agenda, thus forcing the taxpayers to pay a nine per cent tax increase effective July 1. 2010.
Mayor Stewart made the righteous move by vetoing the liberal socialist claim that the mayor didn't have the right to utilize a line item veto--the council even ignoring the city attorney's opinion as being legal. So the two comrades put in play a proclamation for the hiring of an outside attorney which forced the Mayor's veto to protect the interests of the taxpayers from this radical socialist agenda.
In the mean time,a council leadership meeting was held on June 14th. The Majority Leader, Phil Sherwood alleged that he was threatened by the Mayor but took about one week before making his complaint known to the New Britain Police Department--even then requesting that his complaint not be put in writing as reported by our local papers. The Local paper reported that Sherwood stated to the police that he had no wish to see the Mayor arrested or pursue the complaint.
Now new headlines appear with Sherwood reinitiating his complaint claiming that he had been misled by Chief William Gagliardi with his statement to the local papers that he was led to believe that they would make an attempt to corroborate and substantiate Sherwood's view of things--even though he made no official complaint.
Sherwood was also quoted by the local papers as besmirching Chief Gagliardi and one of his Lieutenants, proclaiming that they are incapable of investigating his complaint and suggesting that the council should hire an outside investigator--even more of your tax dollars!
Now a new actor surfaces through FOI documents of emails between Alderman Michael Trueworhty and Phil Sherwood and this actor, State Representative O'Brien. O'Brien apparently proclaimed to the duo of comrades that the Mayor's veto was illegal and O'Brien encouraged the council to hire outside counsel. O'Brien drafted a letter which questions the validity of the Mayor's veto and allegedly Sherwood replaced O'Brien's name on this document with his own, signing it as if Sherwood had authored the letter himself.
The Democratic Socialist Council voted to hire outside council with Sherwood pontificating his views for nearly an hour on the council floor. And the veto followed this liberal push for spending more money for education.
The craziness of this whole story is the constant agenda by the council socialists to make the rich taxpayers pay for their social programs without any concern for the local businesses being able to survive or homeowners who are already financially strapped to be able to afford their ever loving tax increases. Remember the Wal Mart store did say good-bye to the City of New Britain after being picketed by CCAG---Sherwood's Employer, SEIU, O'Brien, Catanzaro, Blumenthal and others.
Now the police investigation is ongoing and hopefully the alleged fabrications will surface and the proper actions will then be taken. Mayor Pro Tempore Trueworthy already threw his former comrade Sherwood under the bus by telling reporters that the mayor never threatened Sherwood in the first place.
More childish antics are surely to follow!
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
36 comments:
very funny. pissy pants has a waterloo!
how does a socialist celebrate the 4th of July?
Frank, you are 100% correct when you say more childish antics are coming. Left wing radicals will stop at nothing to force their agenda onto everyone. I have no doubt they have more tricks up their sleeve to force this agenda through and ultimately ram through this massive tax increase that the mayor vetoed. They obviously don't care how high our taxes have to rise, so long as they have our money to give away to people that someone like Sherwood thinks deserve it more than we do, even if we are the ones who had to work hard to earn it. After all, we deserve to be punished for having more than someone else.
...and if you listen to Sherwood, Walmart needs to be punished for not having Puerto Rican managers at their New Britian store. Does anyone know what the ethnicity or race of their current store manager in New Britain is?
There is one thing people dislike even more than a thief--a liar!
A little song from Stonewall Jackson:
Waterloo, Waterloo, when baby Phil met his Waterloo?
Every liberal has his day, his taxes all of us forced to pay--
Everyone must meet his Waterloo,
Little boy Phil tried to soak us taxpayers, but wet his pants instead,
Met defeat known as Stewart's veto stamp,
and that's when baby Phil met his Waterloo!
Waterloo, Waterloo, when baby Phil met his Waterloo
maybe O'Brien's Waterloo too?
Frank:
" Anonymous said...
maybe O'Brien's Waterloo too?
July 5, 2010 11:53 AM"
Taxpayers of NB , GO FOR IT! And while you are at it, throw in Pudlin!
Sec. 53a-180c. Falsely reporting an incident in the second degree: Class A misdemeanor. (a) A person is guilty of falsely reporting an incident in the second degree when, knowing the information reported, conveyed or circulated to be false or baseless, such person gratuitously reports to a law enforcement officer or agency (1) the alleged occurrence of an offense or incident which did not in fact occur, (2) an allegedly impending occurrence of an offense or incident which in fact is not about to occur, or (3) false information relating to an actual offense or incident or to the alleged implication of some person therein.
Sec. 53a-167a. Interfering with an officer: Class A misdemeanor. (a) A person is guilty of interfering with an officer when such person obstructs, resists, hinders or endangers any peace officer, special policeman appointed under section 29-18b, Department of Motor Vehicles inspector appointed under section 14-8 and certified pursuant to section 7-294d, or firefighter in the performance of such peace officer's, special policeman's or firefighter's duties.
(b) Interfering with an officer is a class A misdemeanor.
§5-7 Penalty for Hindering the Mayor.
If any person shall hinder or obstruct the Mayor in the execution of the duties of
office, or, when commanded to assist herein, shall refuse or unreasonably
neglect to do so, such offender shall pay a fine not to exceed the amount
permitted by the General Statutes, or be imprisoned in a jail not more than the time
permitted by the General Statutes, or both.
The most recent, three anonymous comments; is there a point here? Should the unholy three Democrats, O'brien, Sherwood and Trueworthy be arrested?
Mayor, Go For It!
The Facts About Workplace Violence
Homicide is the second leading cause of fatal occupational injury in the United States. Nearly 1,000 workers are murdered and 1.5 million are assaulted in the workplace each year.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI), in additional information about workplace violence, there were 709 workplace homicides in 1998. These accounted for 12 percent of the total 6,026 fatal work injuries in the United States. Of these 709 workplace homicide victims in 1998, 80 percent were shot and nine percent were stabbed.
Legal Man said...
The Facts About Workplace Violence
Homicide is the second leading cause of fatal occupational injury in the United States. Nearly 1,000 workers are murdered and 1.5 million are assaulted in the workplace each year.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI), in additional information about workplace violence, there were 709 workplace homicides in 1998. These accounted for 12 percent of the total 6,026 fatal work injuries in the United States. Of these 709 workplace homicide victims in 1998, 80 percent were shot and nine percent were stabbed.
LET'S ALSO CONSIDER HOW MANY PEOPLE LOST THEIR JOBS BECAUSE OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS MADE BY A CO-WORKER?
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION:
An action for damages brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has been unsuccessfully commenced without PROBABLE CAUSE and for a purpose other than that of bringing the alleged offender to justice.
An action for malicious prosecution is the remedy for baseless and malicious litigation. It is not limited to criminal prosecutions but may be brought in response to any baseless and malicious litigation or prosecution, whether criminal or civil. The criminal defendant or civil respondent in a baseless and malicious case may later file this claim in civil court against the parties who took an active role in initiating or encouraging the original case. The defendant in the initial case becomes the plaintiff in the malicious prosecution suit, and the plaintiff or prosecutor in the original case becomes the defendant.
An action for malicious prosecution is the remedy for baseless and malicious litigation. It is not limited to criminal prosecutions but may be brought in response to any baseless and malicious litigation or prosecution, whether criminal or civil. The criminal defendant or civil respondent in a baseless and malicious case may later file this claim in civil court against the parties who took an active role in initiating or ENCOURAGING the original case. The defendant in the initial case becomes the plaintiff in the malicious prosecution suit, and the plaintiff or prosecutor in the original case becomes the defendant.
The Mayor hurts his own good cause to lower taxes with a pattern of abusive language and attempts at intimidation.
Maybe not grounds for arrest but It's not really excusable anywhere based on his own admissions
The city's reputation continues to suffer because of its CEO.
A new report to the Connecticut state legislature shows police have used the state's unique gun seizure law to confiscate more than 1,700 firearms from citizens based on suspicion that the gun owners might harm themselves or others.
The state's law permits police to seek a warrant for seizing a citizen's guns based on suspicion of the gun owner's intentions, before any act of violence or lawbreaking is actually committed.
[B]ullying means any intentional written, electronic, verbal or physical act or actions against another person that a reasonable person under the circumstances should know will have the effect of:
(1) Placing a person in reasonable fear of substantial harm to his or her emotional or physical well-being or substantial damage to his or her property.
The only problem with the bullying crap is that Trueworthy already went on the record as saying IT NEVER HAPPENED. Someone isn't being truthful and my math has it being 5 against one.
You decide!
what a tangled web wee wee pants weaves!
Being a bully is not a crime. Falsely reporting an incident to the police is!
Sounds like some local liberal is feeling guilty and trying to deflect attention to the mayor. It isn't going to work this time. There will be a thorough investigation and the laws will be enforced!
Sherwood Wets Pants Over Stewarts "Threat" by the Bizy Bee:
This guy has a few screws loose. The article made him look like a petty schoolboy afraid of the big bully in the grade above him. I mean come on, he even admits in the article that he didn't take the comment as a threat - THEN WHY DID YOU CALL THE COPS? This guy is a proctologists' dream.
The more Mr. Sherwood and Mike Trueworthy open their mouths, the more problems they seem to cause for themselves. I think they have made it quite evident over the past few weeks that this is all about them and their political game rather than the poor taxpayers of New Britain that have to pay for it all.
What the Democrats can't seem to accept is that the taxpayers don't want this. They pay enough taxes. GIVE IT UP!
I have it on good authority that Sherwood's antics are causing a huge rift in the hierarchy of the Democratic Party, As I understand it, the main cause is because of the fact that socialists must lie. Telling the truth is political suicide until they have total control and the electorate can't vote out the socialist dictator. The only way to convert a nation to socialism is to quietly and gradually transform the nation into socialism until one day we all wake up and are totally controlled by a repressive socialist government.
As I understand it, Sherwood is causing a huge problem for the radicals that are pulling the strings in the local party, because he continually runs to the newspapers and draws considerable attention to their efforts to ram more socialism down the throats of the taxpayers. Because of all of Sherwood's media blitzes, too many taxpayers are pushing back against their socialism, and whenever this happens, the Democrats lose control over the rest of our lives.
There's nothing that Democrats want more than to control every aspect of your life--including your bodily excretions.
Some of the things Democrats in Congress have proposed:
Federal laws restricting how long you can shower, with a government computer that will shut your shower head off at whatever point some bureaucrat determines is long enough--Democrats have a bill in Congress to do this.
Limiting the number of sheets of toilet paper you can use for each wipe--Democrats actually have a bill in Congress to do this.
Actual law passed by the Democrats: Makes it a crime to have an incandescent light bulb in your house as of next year. I am sure they will create a light bulb police agency when they get around to it.
Another law that they passed requires you to have only water saving toilets that use so little water that people who have them report the need to flush several times--actually causing you to use more water.
Another bill Democrats submitted would require you to have a permit from the federal government in order to own a house. To get the permit you will need to pass a federal inspection that includes verifying you have the right light bulbs, and water saving toilets, among other things.
I don't understand what the Democrat's fascination with toilets, toilet paper and preventing people from showering is all about, but perhaps it all has something to do with the recent suggestion that Sherwood wee wee'd in his pants?
Some sort of potty deficiency maybe?
Do you ever have the desire to wet your pants?
I dont know why but i am turned on by wetting my pants and ive done it a few times in public and acted like it was an accident.
Sherwood has been quiet all week. I can't remember him going an entire week without shooting off his fat mouth about something nonsensical.
Is he away on vacation or something?
The Dempcratic 3 Stooges ought to have their own comedy hour, produced and directed by their chairman.
The Dempcratic 3 Stooges ought to have their own comedy hour, produced and directed by their chairman.
Betty Boop, it would have to be a comedy hour because their chairman is one of the biggest jokes I ever met!
ROFL: Who would pay for the filming of the comedy hour? The DTC, NB taxpayers? Maybe they can charge viewers $1 each to pay for the production, distribution, etc...A critic's review of the filming would be shown on nbrtc.com
Betty Boop, the Board of Ed would probably pay for it, the same way that they took our tax dollars and hired a production company to produce a television commercial selling parents on using the free services of the school system instead of sending their children to out of town schools. The commercials amounted to little more than the taxpayers being forced to pay to protect union jobs by keeping the students here in the "free" system instead of paying for their own education, and thus eliminating the need for some teacher positions.
Anonymous said...
Betty Boop, the Board of Ed would probably pay for it, the same way that they took our tax dollars and hired a production company to produce a television commercial selling parents on using the free services of the school system instead of sending their children to out of town schools. The commercials amounted to little more than the taxpayers being forced to pay to protect union jobs by keeping the students here in the "free" system instead of paying for their own education, and thus eliminating the need for some teacher positions.
July 10, 2010 10:52 PM
Reply:
A comic strip would be printed in the comics page (as oppose to an editorial cartoon on the editorial page)
Frank,
It appears you were 100% accurate about this fiasco being Sherwood's Waterloo--more to come in the near future!
Post a Comment