Sunday, October 10, 2010

Attack on the CPOA and it's President Answered!


It is with great disappointment that we read a recent letter to the editor ("City's delegations brings home aid," 10/7/10). The writer personally attacked Michael Wanik and accused him of playing politics when he raised legitimate questions about the effectiveness of New Britain’s legislative delegation.



Mr. Wanik, like many reasonable residents, believes not enough state funding is being directed to New Britain to meet our growing fiscal needs, most of which results from numerous unfunded mandates passed by members of the legislature’s Democratic supermajority.

The writer described Mr. Wanik, who is president of the Citizens Property Owners Association Inc., a nonpartisan local taxpayer organization, as a “high-ranking Republican appointee.” For the sake of accuracy, Mr. Wanik is not a member of the New Britain Republican Town Committee and his position is an elected one. Mr. Wanik has nothing to gain personally by the election of a Democrat or a Republican; his group’s allegiance is only to property owners and taxpayers.

In contrast, the writer failed to mention is that he is a member of the New Britain Democratic Town Committee and an official with AFSCME Council 4; therefore, maintaining the status quo and getting his fellow Democrats re-elected is in his best interest.



During the past 50 years, the middle class has been slowly falling behind. We’re losing jobs, working more hours and forgoing raises to stay employed. We’re cutting corners wherever possible to send our children to school, to pay our taxes and living expenses, and to save for retirement.



Meanwhile, many public sector employees, who are paid by our local, state and federal taxes, continue to receive great benefits, annual salary and cost-of-living increases, lifetime pensions and the potential to retire at relatively young ages. Of course, they want nothing to change.


When push came to shove with our recent education budget, the unions didn’t have to make a single concession. The Democrats in Congress found the money needed to rehire laid off teachers all across the country and give them their regular annual raises - with no strings attached.

Instead of being denigrated by some Democratic henchman, Mr. Wanik, and the CPOA, should be applauded for consistently asking members of BOTH political parties tough questions and for leveling legitimate criticism when needed.

Every group that depends on taxpayer dollars has a voice in the halls of power. Visit the Legislative Office Building in Hartford any day and you’ll find scores of lobbyists, activists and advocates for the unions, welfare recipients, inmates, nonprofit groups, quasi-governmental agencies, trade associations, retailers, and many more - all asking for taxpayer money - your money.

Unfortunately, we, the people who actually pay the bills, are so busy working that our point of view is not often represented in the discussion.


If we are elected to our respective offices, we would only seek to be a voice for you – the middle class property owners and taxpayers. And more importantly, we would welcome questions posed by Mr. Wanik, the CPOA or any taxpayer who has concerns about how their tax dollars are being spent - and whether we are effectively serving their needs.




Signed,

Henry Zembko – Candidate for Connecticut State Senate 6th District
Cris Carillo – Candidate for Connecticut State House 24th District
James Griffin – Candidate for Connecticut State House 26th District

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

This would be such a welcome change to have elected officials who actually represent their constituents instead of the special interests who donate boat loads of money to their campaigns as if their votes are being sold to the highest bidder.

Anonymous said...

HARTFORD, CT — Linda McMahon, the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Connecticut, says she will limit herself to two terms if she is elected November 2, 2010. McMahon, who is in a close race with Democratic Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, says she would not seek more than two terms and would not run for a second term unless she believes she had been effective in her first six-year term as U.S. Senator.

McMahon appeared Sunday on ABC's "This Week With Christiane Amanpour."

Anonymous said...

Great letter!

It's about time we all PUSH BACK!

Wouldn't we all love to see the rug pulled out from under these professional politicians who feed off of all of us.

And if it doesn't happen this time, that's ok too, try, try again.

Curious Mind wants to know said...

Why wasn't the name of the writer of the letter to the editor mentioned in this article? Not everyone had read the letter regarding Michael Wanik's viewpoints. The letter writer is as stupid as Mike Wanik is smart;

Anonymous said...

The candidates probably didn't want to bring any additional attention to the letter writer or to the candidates he supports.

Honestly, does his name really matter.

Anonymous said...

The person posting comments about the letter is even dumber than everyone because the 3 authors of the letter signed it at the bottom of the letter.

Anonymous said...

Apparently it confused him when they put "signed" over their names???

Must be a graduate of the inferior, union run, New Britain schools. A graduate of a superior private school could have read that for himself.

Web Tracking
Online Florist