Frank Smith Says NB: Council Meeting – March 9, 2011 | New Britain Republicans

Monday, March 7, 2011

Council Meeting – March 9, 2011 | New Britain Republicans

Freshman Alderman David DeFronzo's resolution motion attacked.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...: DeFronzo is just an Obamabot like his conscientious objector father.; March 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM
Anonymous said...: Speaking of conflicts, Alderman DeFronzo is a BOE employee as a teacher. This means any bonding or budget monies passed from the city to the BOE could benefit him and other Democrat cronies working for the school system!; March 7, 2011 at 4:51 PM
Anonymous said...: I guess the ACORN doesn't fall from from the radical tree, does it?; March 7, 2011 at 5:57 PM
Anonymous said...: Alderman DeFronzo is simply someone trying to show how "with it" he is, which, in actuality he is not.

]He has a B.S. Degree from U Conn in Political Science. I suppose he qualified to hoild a teaching certificate by having a minor in Phys. Ed.

He is probably trying to deflect attention from the fact that his father in law is Larry Hermanowski. Probably, Alderman DeFronzo doesn't realize that, including himself, there are eight (8) Democrat Council members (inlcuding Heranowski) that have interest conflicts because of jobs they hold with the city or related NP agencies.

But of course, that is SOP with Democrats.; March 7, 2011 at 6:01 PM
Anonymous said...: So he is one of those inferior overpaid, under worked union public school teachers?; March 7, 2011 at 8:44 PM
Anonymous said...: does that mean that DeFronzo will get 2 pensions from the city?; March 7, 2011 at 9:27 PM
Anonymous said...: He's trying to assume the duties of former Alderman Sherwood, one of which was to do the thinking for Alderman Trueworthy.; March 8, 2011 at 8:37 AM
Lou Salvio said...: Anyone familiar with Council procedures knows full well why this Resolution has been placed on the Council Meeting agenda for 3/9/11. While the resolution is sufficiently different from a similar one advanced by Trueworthy at the Council's most recent meeting, the intent is the same, to wit, to demonize the Mayor and two Republican Aldermen.

I don't believe that Alderman DeFronzo is/was familiar enough with Council procedures to know that since Alderman Trueworthy"s similar resolution (same intent) was defeated, it could not be submitted again during this Council's tenure. DeFronzo had to be told that. Ergo, submit a "new" one with different wording but, one that has the same intent.

So, the Council will go through this same charade again at it's 3/9 meeting. Why? Because some Democrats haven't looked at what this resolution could mean now, not just what it may mean in November. So, play your silly games but, be careful, then again, DON"T.

Lou Salvio; March 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)