Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Child Care Providers To Be Unionized - Courant.com

Forced By Malloy's Executive Order. Unions are allowed to enter private home businesses. What is next form this Gov.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Matt O'Connor, a spokesman for CSEA/SEIU Local 2001. noted that the union had been seeking unionization for six years for the providers who care for children in their private homes. Overall, about 96 percent of the providers are women, O'Connor said.

Anonymous said...

Haven't we now achieved total communism in Connecticut when a dictator can mandate through an executive order that self employed people working out of their own homes must pay dues to a union?

Anonymous said...

If unions are so wonderful, why must people be forced by the state to belong?

In states where you have the freedom of choice (right-to-work) states, employees exercise their freedom and almost never choose to belong to a union. Union membership in this country is at a 70 year all time low as a result of more and more states becoming "right-to-work" states because apparently no one in their right mind would ever willingly choose to belong to a union anymore than they would have chosen to live behind the iron curtain.

I would love to hear these union zealots explain why if the union is so fabulous, then why must people be forced against their free will to pay into the union against their will?

Anonymous said...

This order is going to have the unintended consequence of creating segregated day care centers.

Since the state is going to illegally enforce the governor's unconstitutional order by withholding the state funding for children attending any day care center that is not unionized, the only way to avoid Malloy's mandate and remain non-union in your own home will be to refuse to accept any children of parents who are using the state's funding.

This in turn will create day care centers where only those who can afford to pay their own way can send their children. You will then have non-union centers of decent hard working people and then union centers full of inner city children.

The end result will be similar to what exists in the education system where those who can afford to, send their children to non-union private or parochial schools for a better education and to avoid the socialist indoctrination by union teachers, and then those who can't afford the private schools are forced to send their children to inferior union run public schools.

For the people who will be able to afford the better non-union day care centers, this might even end up being a huge favor allowing them to segregate their children from the union loving thugs.

Anonymous said...

The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is a non-profit organization providing free legal aid to thousands of employees nationwide whose human and civil rights have been violated by compulsory unionism abuses.

Help stop the spread of this kind of socialism by supporting the National Right To Work Foundation with your tax deductible donation!

Go to www.NRTW.ORG to find out more!

Anonymous said...

I would want to send my children to one of the private day care centers that is free from the low income people. That would keep him from being exposed to those kind of people.

Anonymous said...

I have spoken to a few working people today who were looking forward to having a chance to segregate their children from those city people. They were excited at the idea of segregated day care centers.

Anonymous said...

I read this in the Courant, and it sounds like the same type of radical extremists that have hijacked our city hall have done the same this with the state house:

State Reps Or Union Reps?
Mary Pelletier, Wethersfield
on 2011-12-22 Courant.com

I (and the overwhelming majority of Connecticut taxpayers) completely agree with your editorial Dec. 22 regarding the unsustainable pension formula for state employees ["Unaffordable Giveaway"].

I have little faith in the state legislature implementing any change, however, after finding out my state representative (Russ Morin) is also employed by one of the state employee unions (CEUI). Aside from this being a clear conflict of interest, it illustrates how the unions are in charge at the statehouse, and how state legislators have been more than willing to sacrifice the financial future of all state residents in favor of appeasing their well-organized benefactors.

Anonymous said...

Obamacare this time around, but how long will it be before you are forced by law as a condition of your citizenship to pay into a union?

In socialist Spain, it is a federal crime for anyone to work anywhere in the country unless you are a member of a union. If you are caught working without being a union member, they don't punish you, they put your employer in prison, because following the radical extremism of the left, it is always those evil rich employers that must be punished severely simply for being successful.

If these anti-America radicals can succeed in forcing you to buy a commercial product as a condition of you simply being a citizen, how long will it be before you must pay dues to a union simply for being alive or risk going to prison?

Anonymous said...

Im still learning from you, but Im trying to achieve my goals. I certainly love reading everything that is written on your site.Keep the tips coming. I loved it!

Anonymous said...

Ive been meaning to read this and just never obtained a chance. Its an issue that Im incredibly interested in, I just started reading and Im glad I did. Youre a terrific blogger, one of the best that Ive seen. This blog certainly has some info on topic that I just wasnt aware of. Thanks for bringing this stuff to light.

Web Tracking
Online Florist