Tuesday, June 12, 2012

State Auditor & Wife Apparently Exceed Limits In Donations To Speaker Donovan!

                          Our State Auditor
FRANKSMITHSAYSNB EDITORIAL:

State Auditor John C. Gerragosian and wife Audrey each made donations exceeding $2500 each.

The Hartford Courant reported with their list of campaign donators that John donated a total of $4,500 with four separate donations and his wife Audrey donated a total of $2,900 with four separate donations also.

 Since federal campaign finance law limits the total amount that any one individual may contribute at $2,500, and this is at the route of the case against the others involved in this federal investigation, one question remains: If the Hartford Courant’s report is accurate, when is the federal investigation going to focus on these two individuals?

Many of the newspaper stories have neglected to include state officials for thanking their Speaker with their family donations.

Below is the rest of the list of New Britain donors as reported by the Hartford Courant: Alderman Michael Trueworthy, Representative Peter Tercyak, David Pudlin, Brendan Kennedy, Raquel Kennedy, State Senator Theresa Gerratana, Gregory Gerratana, Harold Gerragosian, and Harriet Gerragosian.

38 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just wondering, did Tercyak list his home address as New Britain or Hartford?

Anonymous said...

Isn't it interesting to read the list of names that would donate huge sums of money to this ultra liberal?

Anonymous said...

I find it amazing that a few of the names actually earn enough money to even donate at all.

The excessive donations seem reasonable considering the job appointments and lifelong fringe benefits that make life so comfy.

Is there risk of being fired?

Anonymous said...

no, say it isn't true.

Anonymous said...

I don't see Sherwood or O'Brien on the list. I am sure that the powers that be will take serious note of that for sure!

Anonymous said...

New Britain State Representative John C. Geragosian (D) resigned his re-elected 25th District seat for a plum $144.789-a-year job as Democratic State Auditor.

When the opposing Republican candidate dropped out early in the 25th District race, Mr.Geragosian still utilized the funds $$$$ of the Citizens Election Program (CEP) In his Democratic re-election campaign for his state legislators seat.

Anonymous said...

Might that be considered payback for such a high paying appointment, and since the auditors work for the legislature, wouldn't the speaker have considerable power and influence to hand out such a patronage position?

Anonymous said...

John oh John I thought you were smarter than that having been in politics for so long.

How in Gods name could you be so stupid.

Anonymous said...

Since the federal campaign finance law limits the total amount that any one individual may contribute at $2,500, and if this is the case against those involved in federal investigation, one question remains: will the FBI federal investigation focus on Democratic State Auditor Mr. John C. Geragosian donation of $4,500 to candidate Donovan ?

Anonymous said...

Frank perhaps it was done because the speaker gave him the job of a lifetime, state auditor that pays over $220K/YEAR! Follow the money folks! All he did was use your tax dollars to buy support like all good democrats have done for many years!. Right Dandy Don!

Anonymous said...

Frank perhaps it was done because the speaker gave him the job of a lifetime, state auditor that pays over $220K/YEAR! Follow the money folks! All he did was use your tax dollars to buy support like all good democrats have done for many years!. Right Dandy Don!

Anonymous said...

Maybe he can't add that high? He is only the state auditor.

Anonymous said...

Isn't the auditor supposed to be beyond reproach???

Anonymous said...

FRANKSMITHSAYSNB EDITORIAL- State Auditor John C. Gerragosian and wife Audrey each made donations exceeding $2500 each. That the Hartford Courant reported with their list of campaign donators that John Gerragosian donated a total of $4,500 with four separate donations and his wife Audrey donated a total of $2,900 with four separate donations also.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Frank perhaps it was done because the speaker gave him the job of a lifetime, state auditor that pays over $220K/YEAR! Follow the money folks! All he did was use your tax dollars to buy support like all good democrats have done for many years!. Right Dandy Don!

This story reminds me of the big job selling scandal that once rocked New Britain, only now it appears they found a legal way to do it, or did they?

Anonymous said...

FDR was opposed to public employees unionizing.

Some 75 years ago In 1937 President Franklin Delano Roosevelt wrote.....

Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the government.

All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations.

The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for officials to bind the employer. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives.

Anonymous said...

So it looks like he compelled taxpayers to pay for his campaign ( a highly immoral act), and then took some of that money and gave it to the Donovan campaign ( a highly illegal act). A true Liberal Democrat from The Working Families Party.

Makes me ashamed that our ancestors belonged to the same tribe.

Anonymous said...

If you actually live in one town, but list a different town on the federal disclosure form, is that not a federal crime?

Anonymous said...

Deciding to become a corrupt public official is bad enough, but making your spouse a party to your corruption is truly despicable. Imagine what her family must think of him.

Anonymous said...

At least he didn't drag his parents into it so that they exceeded the limits. They did also donate, but at least theirs were within the limits.

Anonymous said...

The unions and their minions have equally supported the other Chris for a Washington full time job...Chris Murphy. Are the feds going to follow the money there also? One could only hope.

Anonymous said...

The same governors and legislators who "bargain" with the unions over pay and other contract terms are the very ones who seek their endorsements and campaign cash and man-power at election time.

The time has come to recognize and heed FDR- President Roosevelt's oppositon to public employee unions for this reason.

Anonymous said...

F.D.R. Warned Us

Even George Meany warned us against the evils of public sector unions:

“It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”

That wasn’t Newt Gingrich, or Ron Paul, or Ronald Reagan talking. That was George Meany -- the former president of the A.F.L.-C.I.O -- in 1955. Government unions are unremarkable today, but the labor movement once thought the idea absurd.

Public sector unions insist on laws that serve their interests -- at the expense of the common good.

The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers, however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers. F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

Anonymous said...

When polled, 60 percent of the Wisconsin electorate said they believed that a public servant should be recalled only for official misconduct. Official misconduct means lying, cheating or stealing in office. Governor Scott Walker has never been accused of that.

Scott Walker was on trial for his political beliefs, and the people of Wisconsin were smart enough to recognize that no one deserves to be recalled for that.

When you disagree with someone's political policies, you vote them out of office, you don't throw them out of office.

Anonymous said...

We find it impossible to believe that a candidate for Congress does not know personally anyone who donates $2500 to his campaign and what they might want in return.

Then again, this is how the Democrats work. They pass laws that favor specific interests: unions, trial lawyers, and the like. Candidate Donovan is Mr. Special Interest and will bring more of the same to Washington ?

Anonymous said...

Newly Formed Latino Coalition - Seeks Greater Voice for Latinos in City of New Britain.

Coalition Chairman Francisco Cuin, a family service worker at Head Start in the city, stated that there are three Latinos on the 15-member NB Common Council and one Latino Chairman of the Police Commission. We should have five members, not three, on the Common Council, Cuinon said.

The coalition's goal is to give Latinos a voice in their city. With representation comes respect, Cuin said.

Anonymous said...

His actions cast suspision on his parents' donations as well. They may have been illegal straw donations and need to be scrutinized, along with the donations of everyone else with whom he has close ties.
This scandal is much larger than what has been uncovered so far. We need to get to the bottom of it and bring all those who broke the law to justice.

Anonymous said...

....but I thought Democrats were above the law?

Anonymous said...

I know the perfect place for the largest homeless shelter in the state:
.....
..........
............
..................
......................
...........................
................................
...................................
Why not put it on Commonwealth Avenue?

Anonymous said...

The failure to recall Wisconsin Walker has exposed the Democratic Party for what it is, the party of public employees with one constituency: public employees, and one policy: get more $$$$$ for public employees.

The Democrats only pay lip service to social issues; the Democratic Party exists to raise taxes to give more and more $$$$$ to public employees.

Anonymous said...

Amazing how many rich democrats we have in New Britain. Greg Gerratana and the entire Gerogosian family each have $2500 to piss away for one career politician? No bundling here? What is being promised? More liberal pro-government full-time job entitlements?

This opens a whole can of hurt if the feds decide to peel away this onion to expose the politically connected in New Britain.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Amazing how many rich democrats we have in New Britain. Greg Gerratana and the entire Gerogosian family each have $2500 to piss away for one career politician? No bundling here? What is being promised? More liberal pro-government full-time job entitlements?

This opens a whole can of hurt if the feds decide to peel away this onion to expose the politically connected in New Britain.

I THOUGHT DEMOCRATS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE THE PARTY OF THE POOR PEOPLE?

HOW MANY POOR PEOPLE DO YOU KNOW THAT CAN SEND OFF $4,000 TO A POLITICIAN AS IF IT WAS SIMPLY NOTHING?

Anonymous said...

(HARTFORD, CT) - Governor Dannel P. Malloy today, Tuesday, 6/12/12 announced the initiative that will allow communities, including New Britain and Farmington, to phase-in revaluations of property for a period of up to five years, even if the value of property decreases.

Anonymous said...

It's $2500 per election, and the convention is one election, primary is another, and general is another. So $7500 max.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
It's $2500 per election, and the convention is one election, primary is another, and general is another. So $7500 max.

June 15, 2012 3:37 PM
But Donating to the speaker's campaign that help make the representative's promotion to auditor possible should raise eyebrows.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
It's $2500 per election, and the convention is one election, primary is another, and general is another. So $7500 max.

IF THAT IS TRUE, THEN WHY DID THOSE GUYS GET ARRESTED FOR EXCEEDING THE $2,500 FEDERAL LIMIT AND NOT THE $7,500 FEDERAL LIMIT.

SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE USING DEMOCRATIC MATH WHICH BASICALLY MEANS THAT YOU MAKE THE RULES UP TO SUIT YOUR DESIRES.

Anonymous said...

sounds to me more like job selling?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
It's $2500 per election, and the convention is one election, primary is another, and general is another. So $7500 max.

OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT THE SUBJECT THAN THE FBI!

Web Tracking
Online Florist