Nancy Pelosi’s Solution to Illegal Immigration-- Deport ICE Agents!
John Lillpop Bio
Email Article
Email Us
Print friendly
By John Lillpop Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Shrieker of the U.S. House, vehemently objects to use of the term “illegal aliens” to describe--well, illegal aliens.
Like most smitten-by-dumb liberals, Pelosi prefers the term “undocumented.”
As in “undocumented Democrats.”
As reported, in part, at http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/18/pelosi-tells-illegal-immigrants-work-site-raids-american/” title="Fox News.com">Fox News.com:
“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently told a group of both legal and illegal immigrants and their families that enforcement of existing immigration laws, as currently practiced, is ‘un-American.’
The speaker, condemning raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, referred to the immigrants she was addressing as ‘very, very patriotic.’
‘Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent away from their families?’ Pelosi told a mostly Hispanic gathering at St. Anthony’s Church in San Francisco.”
Pelosi’s tirade is typical of the leftist nonsense for which she is renown. Calling illegal aliens “very, very patriotic” begs two obvious questions:
1. Because they come here illegally and are not subjected to the background, criminal, financial, and medical examinations required of people who obey the law, no one, Pelosi included, knows a damn thing about these people, except that they have no business being in America and are a huge drain on taxpayers.
How in the world can invaders be described as “very, very patriotic” by anyone with even the slightest grip on reality?
2. “Patriotic” to whom, Speaker Pelosi? Illegal aliens refuse to learn English, do not accept American culture, and remain loyal to Mexico, their third world, failed state.
As to her idiotic question, “‘Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent away from their families?” the answer is a resounding: All who give a damn about rule of law and American sovereignty and culture!
Not counting Hispanic racists and Marxists like Pelosi, that adds up to a majority of American citizens!
The next time Pelosi haunts the premises of St. Anthony’s Church in San Francisco, she should address a more appropriate subject, like the Catholic Church’s teachings on abortion.
In doing so, Pelosi should ask, “Who in this room would not want to change the Church’s policy of thwarting a woman’s Constitutional right to kill an unwelcome baby in her belly?”
Other than her own hand, Pelosi might find scant few hands risen in support of child infanticide, even among invading criminals from Mexico!
Reference 1:
(0) Reader Feedback | Subscribe
John Lillpop Most recent columns
John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal. “Clean and sober” since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are actually considered normal!.
John can be reached at: satirebylillpop@yahoo.com
Older articles by John Lillpop
________________________________________
Printed from: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9433
15 comments:
why don't we just deport Pelosi back to San Francisco by giving California back to Mexico?
ANONYMOUS SAYS...
Nancy Pelosi is up to her eyeballs in ethical misconduct. With the earmark she crafted to give taxpayer money to DelMonte Foods in American Samoa (her husband has millions of shares) and her stance on illegal immigrants, it's hard to imagine somone with her unabashed socialistic tendencies is next in line to assume the Presidency of America, This is scary! What have the voters of this country wrought? Obama, Dodd, Barney Frank, Harry Reid, Geithner, etc. We're all caight in the whilpool and going down the sewer of ultra left wing, liberal communism/socialism!
By the way, Pelosi was recorded and exposed on Fox News yesterday making her anti U.S. Government/Immigration Policy speech.
Hasn't everyone in this counctry had enough of this crowd?
Nancy Pelosi/Presiden Obama Solution to Social Security?
On June 29, 2004, the U.S. Commissioner of Social Security and The Director General of the Mexican Social Security Institute reached an agreement – ( http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03993.pdf) - the so-called Totalization agreement. Yes, it took three years of wrangling with Freedom of Information Act by the TREA Senior Citizens League to obtain the document entitled “Social Security – Proposed Totalization Agreement with Mexico”.
The seniors group (TREA) knew that if illegal aliens get legal status -- through an amnesty or some sort of legalization plan such as the one the President and the Senate tried to enact in 2006 -- it would allow illegal immigrants, mostly from Mexico, to gain legal status and access to Social Security benefits for their relatives, children and other dependents.
What the agreement reveals is that the United States will permit illegal aliens from Mexico to collect Social Security benefits if they have as little as 18 months of U.S. employment history. In contrast, U.S. citizens must show 10 years -- 40 quarters -- of perfectly legal job history to collect same Social Security benefits.
Despite the fact that it's illegal for employers to knowingly hire individuals who are in this country illegally, the agreement which awaits the President’s Obama signature, can take effect without Congress' approval. The current 2009 Democratic Congress doesn't have to vote to approve it -- it has only 60 days to disapprove it, which isn't likely because they likely support allowing the agreement to become law.
This agreement would drain more billions from a Social Security system that already lists a $14 trillion liability and assets of only $3.5 trillion, according to a 2003 report generated by the Center for Immigration Studies. And it's worth noting that virtually none of those $3.5 billion in "assets" consists of gold bars or even bundled greenbacks sitting in some government vault.
These so-called "Totalization" agreements are common -- the United States has them with 20 other countries. Their goal is to avoid double taxation when employers assign employees to work temporarily in another country. But, "Totalization” was not designed or intended to cover millions of illegal aliens sneaking past the southern U.S. Border Patrol from what is a borderline Third World country.
The Pew Hispanic Center estimated that there are between 3.4 and 5.7 million unauthorized Mexican citizens in the United States and the Urban Institute has estimated that there are more than 4 million according to GAO-03-993 Social Security Report to Congressional Requesters.
The vast majority of individual tax returns are filed using a social Security Number (SSN) as identification. However, there are instances where alien individuals will file a U.S. tax return. To enable these individuals to file, Treasury Regulations were issued in 1996 to provide them with Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN).
An ITIN is intended for tax purposes only and creates no inference regarding an alien individual’s right to live in the U.S. or be illegally employed here. A study done by the Inspector General’s Office of the Department of Treasury found that 55 percent of illegal aliens who filed income tax returns using tax identification numbers had no federal income tax liability, reflecting their income and large number of dependent.
An analysis of Forms 1040 filed in Tax year 2001 with ITINs found that approximately 530,000 Forms 1040 were filed with ITINs as the primary number by aliens with the number increasing each passing 5 years.
All American’s should be concerned about illegal aliens coming here and getting as good a deal from our government “entitlement” programs with their U.S. Citizenship. In fact, they’re going to get a much better deal from this current Democratic Congress, President Obama and Nancy Pelosi.
Anonymous said... Hasn't everyone in this country had enough of this crowd?
----------------------------------
The problem all people hear is; they are going to give, give, give, give, give.........
Education, homes, jobs, heath care on and on and on and on..........
But who is going to pay for all this?
The fact is that with increased taxes, lower profits and increased cost for everything from government mandated time off, increased licensing cost, so called carbon offset taxes. It will be you and I, 9-5 Joe’s and Jane’s across the country will be picking up the tab.
Unless of course Chris Dodd wants to add one of his patented amendments to these bills so that the government can't take our pay.
But we know that won't happen. Because we don't qualify for government subsidies, we work.
I have friends who left communist Poland. They laugh when the government says that it will take care of all of our needs. They lived through socialism and know it doesn’t work. Educated people were going to jobs and doing nothing all day because the government promised them a job. Hard working people waiting for handouts because the government took all their hard earned profits.
“We hold our heads high, despite the price we have paid, because freedom is priceless.”
Lech Walesa
Kto nie słucha Ojca i Matki, ten sie słucha psiej skóry
Polish proverb loosly translated:
If you don't learn from your parents, you'll learn from the school of hard knocks
Because this state of Connecticut is far left...it wouldn't surprise us one bit if Mayor Perez skates and Senator Dodd gets re-elected in 2010. This state and New Britain has been in the tank for Liberal Democrats far too long.
Keep drinking the Democratic Kool-Aid...all you wonderful New Britain people who keep on pulling the Democratic level. You get what you deserve!
Any of you "responsible Dems" (no such thing) have any remorse over your vote for Obama The Great!
Vote for the Democrats and watch your taxes go sky high as they give your money to people who deserve it more than you, and that is patriotic according to the Vice President.
The Thorn said...
Today Congress is planning to pass a 90% tax on bonuses paid to AIG employees. The fact that they think they can do this, that they want to do this, whether or not they succeed should scare the hell out of you! One Congresswoman even said she would tax them 1,000% if she could because these (rich) people need to be punished severely!
What is next. I could see Congress being outraged over public, state employees in a state which accepted stimulus money from Obama, paying two state government employees state salaries of approximately $1.6 million per year, and even more outrages that they will retire with seven figure salaries and free insurance for the rest of their lives. What if Congress decided they need to be punished and decides to tax them at 90% because they need to be punished?
Then who is next, what about state or city employees who worked overtime and had the audacity to take overtime at time and one half during these tough economic times, when do they need to be punsihed?
How about the CEO of a local hardware manufacturer, a local dairy company, or a local construction company, when does Congress get around to deciding that their salaries are obscene and that they need to be punished?
Where does this madness end and who is next?
If this doesn't outrage you, and wake you from your euphoric slumber, then you are a mush brain for sure and probably will be a great candidate for the New Britain City Council.
A LITTLE GUN HISTORY
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
---- ------------- -------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
------------------------------
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:
List of 7 items:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent.
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.
The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN! SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE. SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER! DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.
Shrieker of the house is a good name for this lunatic!
A story on Fox News today showed how Immigration Officers have stopped arresting illegal aliens, because they fear if they arrest illegal aliens, they will be targeted for retaliation by the Obama administration. After reading the Speaker's comments, do you blame them?
Lets just open the flood gates and let them all come by the millions. we'll give them all free healthcare, free homes, cars, whatever they need for free and we'll just tax all working stiffs in the country at 90% of their income to pay for everything that is free for the new arrivals, and as word spreads back home about everything that is free here, they'll come by the millions and millions and we'll just keep giving them everything free until there are about 3 billion americans and everything will still be free, but who will be able to pay for it all?
Deport Nancy Pelosi
what a coocoo bird, the kind Sherwack most likely worships with his desire!
President Obama Stops VA Private Billing Insurance Talk...
President Obama abandoned a proposal to bill veterans' private insurance companies for the treatment at VA hospitals of combat-related injuries amid an outcry over the measure from veterans' service organizations - The American Legion, the VFW and members of Congress.
The proposal would have authorized the Department of Veterans Affairs to charge private companies for treating injuries and other medical conditions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, that are related to military service.
The measure was intended to save VA about $530 million a year, but the administration's pursuit of third-party billing sparked resistance from leaders of veterans groups, who met this week with President Obama.
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement that the president has "instructed that its consideration be dropped."
Saving a few bucks at the expense of making it near impossible for a Veteran to find work was not a very good idea, at all.
Who would hire a Veteran knowing that it would skyrocket the insurance premiums for their company because they had to cover the costs of treating the Veterans injuries?
President Obama Special Olympics 'joke' on Jay Leno show hurts.
Update: Special Olympics Chairman Maria Shriver Talks About Post-Joke Phone Call With President Obama.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Maria Shriver says President Barack Obama's joke comparing his poor bowling score to that of a Special Olympics athlete was hurtful, although she is sure he didn't mean it that way.
California's first lady issued a statement, a day after the president made the gaffe on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno.
President Obama later called Maria's brother, Special Olympics Chairman Tim Shriver, to apologize also.
Post a Comment