Obviously, Mr. Share the Wealth found the idea of profits more important than his social idealogy when making his latest film. Doesn't he understand the rules of a democracy with regard to union loyalty? He was supposed to have called up his union friends and given all the stagehand positions to their children and friends without any regard for cost effectiveness.
Not to mention his blip about Ct's own Chris Dodd and his mortgage deals. Looks like even Michael Moore might be growing tired of where our nation is headed under the democratic party.
If Moore is so in favor of socialism, why doesn't he take his person millions of dollars and start distributing an equal amount to other people until his funds run out, then we all can have a chance to enjoy his wealth, since he believes we all deserve his money as much as he does?
They tell their members who to vote for because they only support socialist candidates that will guarantee unions more union positions, which in turn generates more dues for the unions, and then gives the unions more money to spread to their socialist candidates, and the merry go round goes round and round.
Moore, the anti-capitalism director, appeared on Hannity tonight. Moore admitted that he owns 2 homes worth millions, so Hannity asked Moore why he doesn't sell these homes and distribute the wealth to people who need it more than him?
6 comments:
Obviously, Mr. Share the Wealth found the idea of profits more important than his social idealogy
when making his latest film. Doesn't he understand the rules of a democracy with regard to union loyalty? He was supposed to have called up his union friends and given all the stagehand positions to their children and friends without any regard for cost effectiveness.
Not to mention his blip about Ct's own Chris Dodd and his mortgage deals. Looks like even Michael Moore might be growing tired of where our nation is headed under the democratic party.
If capitalism is so bad, why isn't the movie free?
Why do you have to pay $8.00 to see it, so that Moore can make money on it?
Isn't that capitalism?
If Moore is so in favor of socialism, why doesn't he take his person millions of dollars and start distributing an equal amount to other people until his funds run out, then we all can have a chance to enjoy his wealth, since he believes we all deserve his money as much as he does?
Why do the unions feel they have to rule everything? It doesn't seem right that they tell their members who to vote for, etc...
They tell their members who to vote for because they only support socialist candidates that will guarantee unions more union positions, which in turn generates more dues for the unions, and then gives the unions more money to spread to their socialist candidates, and the merry go round goes round and round.
Moore, the anti-capitalism director, appeared on Hannity tonight. Moore admitted that he owns 2 homes worth millions, so Hannity asked Moore why he doesn't sell these homes and distribute the wealth to people who need it more than him?
Post a Comment