FRANKSMITHSAYSNB EDITORIAL:
Alderman Larry Hermanowski's answer to the athletic crowd in attendance over the Beehive lights issue "the council fully intended to approve the project."
With Alderman Phil Sherwood adding "I would be upset too after reading what I read in the newspapers, it was a radical misrepresentation."
The radical part of all this, Alderman Sherwood, is the council's attempting to place the blame everywhere else but where it really belongs---- to the Radical Democratic side of the council membership.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
anonymous said
Alderman Phil Sherwood adding "I would be upset too after reading what I read in the newspapers, it was a radical misrepresentation."
I guess the message from Sherwood is that if he doesn't approve the information printed in the Herald (most likely before it is printed), then the Herald is a bunch radicals. It sounds like only Sherwood and his bunch of misfits are the only ones in his eyes that are not radicals. Perhaps, the truth is just the opposite.
Hopefully, just like the residents of Massachusetts woke up to the radical extremism of the Democrats by replacing the so-called liberal lion, Ted Kennedy, with a conservative Republican, so too will the residents of New Britain wake up to the radical socialists on the common council. Unfortunately, the people of New Britain seem to be slower to awaken from their slumber.
Sounds to me like Phil Sherwood is accusing the New Britain Herald of lying?
Can someone who knows please explain what the difference between the vote two weeks ago not to fix the lights versus this week's vote to reconsider the last vote and vote to fix the lights?
Is the Herald not truthful or the politicians?
I tend to believe the latter.
Apparently it all has to do with the herald printing a story that wasn't authorized and pre-approved by Sherwood, as he apparently controls whatever the herald does or doesn't print.
Anonymous said...
Can someone who knows please explain what the difference between the vote two weeks ago not to fix the lights versus this week's vote to reconsider the last vote and vote to fix the lights?
Is the Herald not truthful or the politicians?
I tend to believe the latter.
...Perhaps you should pose that question as to who is being truthful to the Herald???
Perhaps the Herald should either acknowledge or deny stories that Sherwood is controlling what it prints regarding the Common Council. I can believe it about the council approving or disapproving what Rick Guiness had printed, but what about James Craven?
Post a Comment