Monday, February 21, 2011

Terry Gerratana – Unable to Take a Stance | New Britain Republicans

On the Death Penalty Repeal Issue!

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Anyone could expect this libtard to be against the death penalty, but she won't admit it because she is simply pandering for votes from the people who support executing these pieces of trash.

Anonymous said...

In order to take a stance, you first must have a brain!

Anonymous said...

Does she think the murderers of the Petit family should spend the next 40-50 years in prison? The taxpayers would be giving them free room and board, free medical benefits, among other things, all at the taxpayers expense.

Let them meet their maker now...the sooner the better!

Anonymous said...

A puppet doesn't ever have to make a decision.

Anonymous said...

Here are the districts and the candidates in the special elections, as listed by the secretary of the state:

Senate

6th: Berlin, part of Farmington. New Britain. Candidates: Terry Bielinski Gerratana (D, WF), Timothy T. Stewart (R)

NOTE: Gerratana -(WF) Working Families Party.

Two bites at apple for Terry "Snow White" Gerratana?

Anonymous said...

Perhaps the greatest error regarding the union movement came in 1962 when President John F. Kennedy issued an executive order to grant all federal government employees the right to unionize and collectively bargain with departments and agencies.

This accounts for the rise in power of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) with its 1.8 million members and the deceptively named National Education Association (NEA), a union, the largest in the nation. It has 3.2 million members and employs more than 550 staff.

Anonymous said...

Terry Bielinski Gerratana (D, WF),

I see she did accept the endorsement of the radical ACORN Working Families Party which has nothing to do with working families and every to do with extremism!

Anonymous said...

Question....

Should states limit public employee unions' right to bargain on benefits?

Yes. Health and pensions costs for Connecticut State Workers are out of control. But some elected leaders seem to have no backbone with unions, whose votes they need.

A law limiting collective bargaining rights would keep Connecticut from going bankrupt.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Question....

Should states limit public employee unions' right to bargain on benefits?

Yes. Health and pensions costs for Connecticut State Workers are out of control. But some elected leaders seem to have no backbone with unions, whose votes they need.

A law limiting collective bargaining rights would keep Connecticut from going bankrupt.

THE BIG PROBLEM FOR STATE EMPLOYEES HERE IN CONNECTICUT IS THAT THEY ARE FORCED, MANY TIMES AGAINST THEIR WILL TO BELONG TO THE UNION AND PAY DUES WHETHER THEY WANT TO OR NOT. MUCH OF THIS MONEY THAT IS FORCIBLY TAKEN OUT OF THEIR PAYCHECKS AGAINST THEIR WILL IS DONATED TO DEMOCRAT'S CAMPAIGNS TO KEEP THE DEMOCRATS PASSING LAWS FAVORABLE TO THE UNIONS AND MAKING SURE THE LEGISLATURE CONTINUES TO GIVE BLANK CHECKS TO ALL STATE EMPLOYEE UNIONS.

THE RIGHT THING TO DO IS TO MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR ANY EMPLOYER TO FORCE YOU AGAINST YOUR WILL AS A CONDITION OF YOUR EMPLOYMENT TO EITHER BELONG TO A UNION OR PAY DUES TO A UNION YOU DO NOT WANT TO BELONG TO. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE A UNION MEMBER, WHY CAN'T YOU HAVE THE FREEDOM TO NEGOTIATE ON YOUR OWN WITH YOUR EMPLOYER WITHOUT THE UNION? ISN'T THAT WHAT FREEDOM IS ALL ABOUT?

IT IS LIKE LIVING IN A DICTATORSHIP WHERE YOU ARE FORCED LIKE A PRISONER TO BELONG TO A UNION YOU DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO.

Web Tracking
Online Florist